Stevens v. DeWitt County, Illinois et al.
| Susan Stevens |
| DeWitt County, Illinois, Kathy Weiss, Andrew Killian, Ryan Buehenrkemper and Dick Koritz |
| 3:2011cv03162 |
| June 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
OPINION: Defendant Ryan Buehnerkemper's Motion to Reconsider Reasonableness of Costs 92 and Defendant Kathy Weiss's Motion for Leave to Join Defendant Ryan Buehnerkemper's Motion to Reconsider Reasonableness of Costs 93 are GRANTE D. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to amend the Judgment to reflect that Defendant Buehnerkemper is awarded costs in the amount of $2,543.45 and Defendant Weiss is awarded costs in the amount of $2,366.70. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/21/2013. (ME, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
90
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/16/2013. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Bill of Costs (d/e 87 ) is GRANTED IN PART. The DeWitt County Defendants are awarded costs in the amount of $1,254.30. Defendant Buehnerkemper is awarded costs in the amount of $1,479.95. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
83
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 09/04/2013. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Ryan Buehnerkemper (d/e 59 ) and Defendant Kathy Weiss (d/e 66 ) are GRANTED IN PART. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims for false arrest and false imprisonment (Counts I and II). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law malicious prosecution claim (Count III). Count III is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant Weiss' Motion for Sanctions (d/e 55 ) and Plaintiff's request for sanctions made in her response to Defendant Weiss' Motion for Sanctions are both DENIED. CASE CLOSED. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
53
OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Defendant Ryan Buehnerkemper's Motion to Compel 48 ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
39
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 03/28/2012. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Ryan Buehnerkemper 33 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent Plaintiff attempted to raise an equal-protection claim, that claim is dismissed without prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss is denied in all other respects. Defendant Buehnerkemper shall file an answer to Counts I, II, and III on or before April 11, 2012. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION: The Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant Ryan Buehnerkemper 15 and Defendants DeWitt County, Kathy Weiss, Andrew Killian, and Dick Koritz 23 are GRANTED. Count IV is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Counts I and II are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJ UDICE and with leave to replead, at which time Plaintiff may also replead Count III. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint on or before October 31, 2011. Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead on or before November 14, 2011. If Plaintiff does not replead, this Court will enter an order dismissing Counts I and II with prejudice and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/17/11. (ME, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
