Montilla v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
| Julian Montilla |
| Aramark Food Services Corp, Larry J Phillips, Alfreda Kibby, Eugene McAdory, Steve Dredge, Sandra Simpson and Any and all other persons discovered through the course of discovery to have participated in the events and actions complained of herein |
| 3:2011cv03193 |
| July 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Schuyler |
| Harold A. Baker |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 2/16/2017. The motions for summary judgment by Defendants Aramark and Dredge are denied 54 , 56 and 58 . The motion for an extension to file a motion for summary judgment by Defendants Blaesing and S cott is granted, d/e 60 . The motion for summary judgment was filed within the requested extension. The motion for summary judgment by Defendants Blaesing and Scott is granted on the grounds of qualified immunity, d/e 68 . Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied, d/e 70 . The motion to substitute Attorney Rockershousen for Attorney Feng is granted, d/e 75 . Defendants Blaesing and Scott are terminated from the case. This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
