Hankinson, D.C. v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
| William E. Hankinson, D.C. |
| Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, R. Adam Springer and James Smith |
| 3:2011cv03205 |
| July 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Charles H. Evans |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
OPINION: The Motions to Dismiss (d/e 11 , 22 ) filed by Defendants Smith and Springer are GRANTED. Accordingly, Count IV against Smith is Dismissed. Likewise, Counts III and VI against Springer are DISMISSED. Further, Northwestern's Motion to Dismiss (d/e 14 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Northwestern's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Count II. Northwestern's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as it relates to Counts V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX. Counts V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX are DISMISSED. This matter is referred back to Judge Cudmore for further pre-trial proceedings. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/23/2012. (MJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
6
OPINION: Plaintiff's Objection (d/e 5) is DENIED. This matter will proceed in this Court. See written Opinion. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/1/2011. (MJ, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
