United States of America et al v. Supervalu Inc et al
| United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Maryland, State of Massachusetts, State of Minnesota, State of Montana, State of Nevada, State of New Hampshire, State of New Jersey, State of North Carolina, State of Rhode Island, State of Virginia and State of Wisconsin |
| Supervalu Inc, Acme Sav-On Pharmacy, Albertsons Osco Pharmacy, Albertsons Sav-On Pharmacy, Biggs Pharmacy, Cub Pharmacy, Farm Fresh Pharmacy, Jewel Pharmacy, Jewel-Osco Pharmacy, Shaws Osco Pharmacy, Shop N Save Pharmacy, Shop N Save Osco Pharmacy, Shoppers Pharmacy, Star Osco Pharmacy, SuperValu Holdings, Inc., FF Acquisitions, LLC, Foodarama LLC, Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp., SuperValu Pharmacies, Inc., Albertson's, LLC, Jewel Osco Southwest LLC, New Albertson's, Inc., American Drug Stores, LLC, Acme Markets, Inc., Shaw's Supermarket, Inc., Star Market Company, Inc., Jewel Food Stores, Inc. and AB Acquisition LLC |
| 3:2011cv03290 |
| August 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard Mills |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
328
OPINION: The Defendants' Motion to Compel the Government Agency to allow the former Government Employee to testify in accordance with Trial Subpoena or, in the alternative, Motion for Adverse-Inference Instruction (d/e 283 ) is DENIED.The Clerk will terminate as moot Non-Party Witness Dr. Cynthia Tudor's Motion to Quash Trial Subpoena (d/e 278 ). (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 12/31/2019. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
317
OPINION: The Relators' motion for sanctions (d/e 205 ) is DENIED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 11/15/2019. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
301
OPINION: The Relators' first motion for partial summary judgment (d/e 164 ) is ALLOWED. The Court finds that Defendants' lower matched prices, offered to the general public and widely and consistently available, are the usual and customary prices for their drugs. The Court further finds that Medicare Part D and Medicaid were entitled to those actual usual and customary prices. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 8/5/2019. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
292
OPINION Entered by United States District Judge Richard Mills on 05/24/2019. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Defendants' motion to exclude the expert testimony of Mr. John Bertko (d/e 179 ) is DENIED. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
280
OPINION: The Relators' motion to exclude testimony under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c)(1) (d/e 209 ) is DENIED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 3/28/2019. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
276
OPINION: The motion to exclude the expert testimony of Mr. Ian Dew (d/e 177 ) is DENIED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 3/19/2019. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
274
OPINION: The Relators' motion to strike Defendants' ninth, tenth, eleventh and fourteenth affirmative defenses (d/e 153 ) is DENIED. The Relators' motion for partial summary judgment as to the Defendants' tenth affirmative def ense and fourteenth affirmative defense (d/e 154 ) is ALLOWED in part and DENIED. The motion is Allowed as to the fourteenth affirmative defense. The fourteenth affirmative defense is stricken. The motion is Denied as to the tenth affirmative defense. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 3/12/2019. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
273
OPINION: The Relators' Motion to Strike the Declaration of Michael Viirre (d/e 131 ) is DENIED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 3/8/2019. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
242
OPINION: The Defendants' Motion for Limited Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence [d/e 92 ] is DENIED.(SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 7/12/2018. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
231
OPINION: The Defendants' Objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's Opinion and Order denying the Defendants' Motion to Compel (d/e 155 ) are DENIED. The Court declines to modify or set aside the United States Magistrate Judge's Opinion and Order (d/e 143 ) denying the Defendants' Motion to Compel Relators Answer to Defendants' Interrogatory No. 15 (d/e 123 ). (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 6/28/2018. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
185
OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendants' Motion for Determination of Privilege and Inadvertent Production 146 is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
141
OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Relators Tracy Schutte and Michael Yarberry's Motion to Compel 109 is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See written order. All documents ordered to be produced in this Opinion shall be produced by Defendants by May 31, 2018. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
80
OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Relators Tracey Schutte and Michael Yarberry's Motion to Compel 75 is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
65
OPINION: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) and9(b) 37 is DENIED.This action is referred to United States Magistrate Judge TomSchanzle-Haskins for further proceedings related to discovery and entry ofa scheduling order. SEE Written Opinion. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 10/21/2016. (ME, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins: Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 58 is ALLOWED. Discovery is STAYED until the District Court rules on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b) 37 . See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
