Shaw v. Anglin et al
| Detrick Shaw |
| S A Godinez, Young, John Doe, Michael Puisis, Vipin Shah, Gladyse Taylor, Keith Anglin, Leonta L Jackson, Mary Miller, James Sledge, State of Illinois and Dr Talbot |
| 3:2011cv03366 |
| September 26, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Brown |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/13/2012. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (1) The motion for summary judgment by Defendant Puisis is granted (d/e 37 ). Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Puisis are dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. The clerk is directed to terminate Defendant Puisis. (2) Plaintiff's responses to the other pending motions for summary judgment are due December 3, 2012. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/27/2011. The merit review hearing scheduled for 10/31/2011 is cancelled. Defendants Anglin; Jackson; Young; Taylor; John Doe (Western's health care administrator); Sledge; Miller and Godinez are dismissed for failure to state a claim against them. Defendant State of Illinois is dismissed as redundant. Case referred to the Magistrate Judge for entry of a Scheduling Order directing service and setting a Rule 16 conference date. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
