Langen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Jennifer Langen |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
3:2011cv03369 |
June 30, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Sangamon |
Byron G. Cudmore |
James E. Shadid |
Employment |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Non-Party Subpoena 26 is DENIED. See written order. (LB, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Langen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jennifer Langen | |
Represented By: | Douglas J Quivey |
Represented By: | Colleen R Lawless |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Charles E Reis, IV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.