Allen et al v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
| William Allen, Tommy Greenfield, Harold Peppers, Donald Stinson, Harold Lee TineyBey, Larry Johnson and Anthony Collins |
| Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Steve Dredge, Jennifer Blaesing, Forest Ashby, Johnson, Gregg A. Scott and Michelle R B Saddler |
| 3:2011cv03382 |
| October 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Schuyler |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 01/25/2012. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (1) Plaintiffs' claims regarding the mechanically separated chicken and the food service are stayed, pending resolution of Smego v. Aramark, 10-3334, because resolu tion of the Smego case may moot or modify these claims. (2) Plaintiffs' claims about their religious diet are dismissed without prejudice to filing an amended complaint. If Plaintiffs seek to pursue their religious diet claims in this case, they must file an amended complaint by February 14, 2012. The amended complaint must explain how the food preparation violates their religion; what actions they took to inform each Defendant of these alleged violations; each Defendant's response; and, each Defendant's participation in the alleged violations. (3) The hearing scheduled for January 30, 2012, is cancelled. The clerk is directed to notify the facility of the cancellation. (4) Defendant Simpson's motion to be dismissed is denied as moot (d/e 19). Defendant Simpson has been terminated as a defendant. (5) Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order to stop the serving of mechanically separated chicken is denied (d/e 21), subject to renewal after the resolution of the Smego case.(DM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
