Levi v. Bednarz et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Levi
Defendant: Michael Bednarz and Hugh Lochard
Case Number: 3:2012cv03002
Filed: January 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge: Sue E. Myerscough
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 195 OPINION Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/5/16. Plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for a new trial is DENIED 187 . (SW, ilcd)
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 01/31/2012. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (1) The hearing scheduled for February 6, 2012, is cancelled. The clerk is directed to notify Plaintiff's prison of the cancellation. (2) Pursuant to its review of the Complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiff states a federal constitutional claim against Defendants Bednarz and Lochard for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical needs. Accordingly, Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is granted on this claim (d/e 2). Any other claims shall not be included in the case, except at the Court's discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. (3) Defendants Saddler and Phillips are dismissed for failure to state a claim against them. (4) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for entry of a Scheduling Order directing service and setting a Rule 16 conference date. A copy of this Opinion shall be served with the Complaint and Scheduling Order. (5) Defendants shall file an answer within the time prescribed by Local Rule. A motion to dismiss is not an answer. The answer should include all defenses appropriate under the Federal Rules. The answer and subsequent pleadings shall be to the issues and claims stated in this Opinion. (DM, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Levi v. Bednarz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Levi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Bednarz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hugh Lochard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?