Jackson v. Willis et al
| Nathaniel Jackson |
| . Willis and Eddie J. Payne |
| 3:2012cv03023 |
| January 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Perry |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
OPINION entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 1/10/2014. For the reasons stated in the opinion, Motion 102 is granted in part and denied in part, motion 100 is denied as moot and motions 126 , 128 are denied as moot. See written opinion. Copy mailed to the Plaintiff at Nathaniel Jackson,B 15383, Danville Correctional Center, Inmate Mail/Parcels, 3820 E Main St, Danville, IL 61834. (JMW, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 2/4/2013. The merit review scheduled for 2/11/2013 is cancelled. This cause is set for further scheduling procedures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 on 4/22/2013 at 1:30 p.m., or as soon as the Court can reac h the case before Judge Sue E Myerscough by telephone conference. The conference will be cancelled if service has been accomplished and no pending issues need discussion. Accordingly, no writ shall issue for Plaintiff's presence unless directed by the Court. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
