Donelson v. Watson et al
| Charles Donelson |
| Leonta Jackson, . Wildrop, . Adams, Austin Randolph, Kevin Burberry, Joe Jennings, Eddie Jones, . Lindsey, Richard Young, Sarah Johnson, Jimmy Watson, . Hamilton, . Pool, . Roberts, Terri Anderson, . Bradbury, . Davis, . Steele and Tara Goins |
| 3:2012cv03086 |
| March 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Livingston |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
223
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 1/24/2013. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
137
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E Myerscough. The following motions are granted: d/e's 85 , 97 , 102 , 119 and 130 . The following motion is granted in part, d/e 127 . The following motions are denied: d/e's 78 ; 88 ; 95 ; 103 ; 105 ; 108 ; 112 ; 113 ; 114 ; 120 ; 122 ; 124 ; and 125 . Motions 89 , 123 and 126 are denied as moot. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for 1/6/2014 at 1:30 PM by video conference from Springfield (court to initiate conference) bef ore Judge Sue E. Myerscough., Jury Trial is set for 2/4/2014 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 1 in Springfield before Judge Sue E. Myerscough. (SEE WRITTEN ORDER FOR ALL DEADLINES SET IN THIS CASE). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/26/2012. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
67
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/19/2012. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this Court's denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction is denied, d/e 61 . Plaintiff has filed what the Court construes as a motion for leave to file an interlocutory appeal to challenge the Court's denial of Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. The motion is denied as unnecessary, d/e 64 . (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
8
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/18/2012. The merit review scheduled for April 23, 2012 is cancelled. Sua sponte, the Court adds Correctional Officer Bradbury as a Defendant because Plaintiff may be attempting to sue Bradbury instead of Burberry. This cause is set for further scheduling procedures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 on June 18, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. (or as soon as the Court can reach the case) before Judge Sue E. Myerscough. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
