Heeman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Central District Heeman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Heeman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Lonald W Heeman
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2012cv03165
Filed:	June 21, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Springfield Office
County:	Morgan
Presiding Judge:	Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge:	Sue E. Myerscough
Nature of Suit:	Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 21, 2013	Filing 22 OPINION: Plaintiff Lonald Heeman's Application for Brief in Support of Relief Under the Equal Access to Justice Act Pursuant to Sentence Four Remand (d/e 21 ) is ALLOWED. The Court awards Plaintiff Lonald Heeman $4,212.00 in attorney fees. Plaintiff Heeman has assigned the award of fees to his attorney. The Acting Commissioner is therefore directed to pay the amount of the award that is not subject to offset directly to his attorney, D. Terrell Dempsey. Entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 8/19/2013. (MJ, ilcd)
June 26, 2013	Filing 19 OPINION: Defendant Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin's Motion for Remand 16 is ALLOWED. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Commissioner is directed to assign this matter to a new Administrative Law Judge on remand who shall conduct a de novo hearing on the matter. Entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 6/25/2013. (ME, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 21, 2013

Filing 22 OPINION: Plaintiff Lonald Heeman's Application for Brief in Support of Relief Under the Equal Access to Justice Act Pursuant to Sentence Four Remand (d/e 21 ) is ALLOWED. The Court awards Plaintiff Lonald Heeman $4,212.00 in attorney fees. Plaintiff Heeman has assigned the award of fees to his attorney. The Acting Commissioner is therefore directed to pay the amount of the award that is not subject to offset directly to his attorney, D. Terrell Dempsey. Entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 8/19/2013. (MJ, ilcd)

June 26, 2013

Filing 19 OPINION: Defendant Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin's Motion for Remand 16 is ALLOWED. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Commissioner is directed to assign this matter to a new Administrative Law Judge on remand who shall conduct a de novo hearing on the matter. Entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 6/25/2013. (ME, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lonald W Heeman
Represented By:	D Terrell Dempsey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?