Broomfield v. Frey et al
| Henry Broomfield |
| Leo Zappa, Marlene Frey, Tim Young, Rodney Yoswig, Charles Cox and Robert Fleck |
| 3:2012cv03172 |
| June 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Schuyler |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 08/15/2012. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (1) The merit review scheduled for August 20, 2012 is cancelled. (2) Plaintiff's claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim, as barred by the statute of li mitations, and/or as barred by judicial and prosecutorial immunity. This case is closed. The clerk is directed to enter a judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. (3) Plaintiff must still pay the full docketing fee of $350 even though his case h as been dismissed. (4) If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice. If appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. (DM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
