Lewis v. Young
Petitioner: Aaron Lewis
Respondent: Richard Young
Case Number: 3:2012cv03214
Filed: August 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Brown
Presiding Judge: Richard Mills
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION. The Petition of Aaron Lewis for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 1 is DENIED. The Motion of Respondent Tarry Williams for Summary Judgment 15 is ALLOWED. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254, the Court DENIES a Certificate of Appealability to the Petitioner. Case Closed. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 7/26/13. (CC, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Aaron Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?