Mitchell v. Austin et al
Kevin Mitchell |
Hector Garcia, Douglas Albracht, Sherry Benton, Glenn Austin, Salvador Godinez, Mike Montcalm, Becky Sudbrink, Mark Greene, Dennis Larson and Jill Wahl |
3:2012cv03296 |
October 31, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Morgan |
Byron G. Cudmore |
Sue E. Myerscough |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 12/4/2012. The merit review scheduled for December 10, 2012 is cancelled. Defendants Glenn Austin; Salvador Godinez; Mike Montcalm; Mark Greene; Douglas Albracht; Sherry Benton and Hector Garcia are d ismissed for failure to state a claim against them. A Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 2/19/2013 at 1:30 PM by telephone from Springfield (court will place call) before Judge Sue E. Myerscough. The conference will be cancelled if service h as been accomplished and no pending issues need discussion. Accordingly, no writ will issue for Plaintiff's presence unless directed by the Court. Plaintiff shall immediately notify the Court of any change in his mailing address and telephone number. Plaintiff's failure to notify the Court of a change in mailing address or phone number will result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with prejudice. (MAS, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.