T.G. et al v. Hamos
Plaintiff:
M.C., T.G., C.B. and L.H.
Defendant:
Julie Hamos
Case Number:
3:2012cv03320
Filed:
November 29, 2012
Court:
Illinois Central District Court
Office:
Springfield Office
County:
McLean
Referring Judge:
Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge:
Richard Mills
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action:
42:1396 - Tort Negligence
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| April 21, 2014 | 33 |
OPINION (See Written Opinion): For the reasons stated, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Case to Northern District of Illinois (d/e 21 ) is DENIED. The Court, sua sponte, STAYS this cause of action pending a determination in N.B. v. H amos of whether the Department's system violates the EPSDT provisions and the integration mandate of the ADA and Rehabilitation Act. All pending deadlines are vacated. The pending Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 19 ) is DISMISSED with leave to refile after a ruling in N.B. v. Hamos. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/21/2014. (VM, ilcd)
|
| February 27, 2013 | 13 |
OPINION (See Written OPINION):The preliminary injunction hearing scheduled regarding Plaintiff P.G.in A.K. et al. v. Hamos et al., No. 13-3020 set for March 4, 2013 at 3:00p.m. is VACATED and RESET to March 20, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 02/27/2013. (VM, ilcd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.