Hawrelak v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Central District Hawrelak v. Commissioner of Social Security

Hawrelak v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Ronald M Hawrelak
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2013cv03026
Filed:	February 5, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Springfield Office
County:	Sangamon
Presiding Judge:	Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge:	Sue E. Myerscough
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2015	Filing 51 OPINION: Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 48 are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation 47 is ACCCEPTED AND ADOPTED as the Opinion and Order of the Court, subject to the modifications of the Statement of Facts. Defendant's Motion for Summary Affirmance 44 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 41 is DENIED. This case is CLOSED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/30/2015. (GL, ilcd)
November 26, 2013	Filing 19 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/22/2013. Defendant's Motion to Remand, d/e 10 is GRANTED, with the instruction that Defendant must remand Plaintiff's claim for a de novo hearing if the missing recording is not located wit hin 60 days. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Motion for Remand, d/e 12 is DENIED. The case is STAYED until either the recording is located or a de novo hearing is conducted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's pending Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 11 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff may refile the Motion for Summary Judgment when the STAY is lifted. (MAS, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2015

Filing 51 OPINION: Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 48 are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation 47 is ACCCEPTED AND ADOPTED as the Opinion and Order of the Court, subject to the modifications of the Statement of Facts. Defendant's Motion for Summary Affirmance 44 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 41 is DENIED. This case is CLOSED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/30/2015. (GL, ilcd)

November 26, 2013

Filing 19 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/22/2013. Defendant's Motion to Remand, d/e 10 is GRANTED, with the instruction that Defendant must remand Plaintiff's claim for a de novo hearing if the missing recording is not located wit hin 60 days. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Motion for Remand, d/e 12 is DENIED. The case is STAYED until either the recording is located or a de novo hearing is conducted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's pending Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 11 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff may refile the Motion for Summary Judgment when the STAY is lifted. (MAS, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawrelak v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald M Hawrelak
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?