Schloss v. Wilczynski et al
| Jeremy L Schloss |
| Aimee Wilczynski, Cody Bond, Kenneth Queen, Shelly Ganz, Shan Jumper, Sharlene Caraway, Sandra Simpson, Jessica Tucker, Stephen Schostak, Forest Ashby, Julie Oberhausen, Michelle R.B. Saddler, Illinois Department of Human Services, Liberty Health/Behavioral Health Corporation and All others discovered through the course of discovery who participated in the events and actions herein |
| 3:2013cv03029 |
| February 7, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Schuyler |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
OPINION Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 10/21/14. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 58 Motion to Compel and 59 Motion to Compel are Denied as Moot; 75 Motion for Leave to File is Denied and 79 Motion for Extension of Time to File is Granted. The dispositive motion deadline is extended to 12/1/14. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (SKD, ilcd)
|
Filing
5
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/15/2013. Defendants Simpson and the Illinois Department of Human Services are dismissed. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2013 at 1:30 PM by telephone from Springfield (court will place call) before Judge Sue E. Myerscough. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.