Smego v. Weitl

Smego v. Weitl

Plaintiff:	Richard M Smego
Defendant:	Kimberly Weitl
Case Number:	3:2013cv03068
Filed:	March 11, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Springfield Office
County:	Schuyler
Presiding Judge:	Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge:	Sue E. Myerscough
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 25, 2013	Filing 11 MERIT REVIEW OPINION (See Written Opinion): IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is granted (d/e 2 ); 2) Plaintiff's motion to supplement is granted (d/e 10 ) to the extent that Plaintiff was re questing the Court to consider the additional information; 3) the Clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures; and, 4) Defendants Weitl, Queen, Prezell, and Goorley are terminated. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/25/2013. (VM, ilcd)
May 10, 2013	Filing 7 OPINION (SEE WRITTEN OPINION): 1. Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint is granted (d/e 5 ). The clerk is directed to docket the Amended Complaint before docketing this order. 2. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim, without prejudice to filing another Amended Complaint regarding Plaintiff's claim of inappropriate treatment at Rushville. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is due May 31, 2013. 3) The hearing scheduled for May 20, 2013, is cancelled asunnecessary. The clerk is directed to notify Plaintiff's detention facility of the cancellation. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/10/2013. (VM, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 25, 2013

Filing 11 MERIT REVIEW OPINION (See Written Opinion): IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is granted (d/e 2 ); 2) Plaintiff's motion to supplement is granted (d/e 10 ) to the extent that Plaintiff was re questing the Court to consider the additional information; 3) the Clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures; and, 4) Defendants Weitl, Queen, Prezell, and Goorley are terminated. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/25/2013. (VM, ilcd)

May 10, 2013

Filing 7 OPINION (SEE WRITTEN OPINION): 1. Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint is granted (d/e 5 ). The clerk is directed to docket the Amended Complaint before docketing this order. 2. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim, without prejudice to filing another Amended Complaint regarding Plaintiff's claim of inappropriate treatment at Rushville. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is due May 31, 2013. 3) The hearing scheduled for May 20, 2013, is cancelled asunnecessary. The clerk is directed to notify Plaintiff's detention facility of the cancellation. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/10/2013. (VM, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smego v. Weitl
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly Weitl
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard M Smego
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?