Miller v. Roberson et al
| James Paul Miller |
| Kess Roberson, Tom Ackmann, . Christine, Walsh, Stoldt, Gresham, . Stahl, Mark Lamothe, Jeff Short, Lisa Lercher, . Stanley, Fishal and . Kennedy |
| 3:2013cv03179 |
| June 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Logan |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/26/2013. Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied with leave to renew, d/e 7 after Plaintiff demonstrates that he has made reasonable attempts to find counsel on his own. Plaintiff's moti on to amend to add additional Defendants is denied, d/e 8 . Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the Defendants from administering a drug test to Plaintiff is denied, d/e 10 . Plaintiff's motion for a status is denied as moot, d/e 11 . This cause is set for further scheduling procedures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 on November 26, 2013, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon as the Court can reach the case, before U. S. District Judge Sue E. Myerscough by telephone conference. The conference will be cancelled if service has been accomplished and no pending issues need discussion. Accordingly, no writ shall issue for Plaintiff's presence unless directed by the Court. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
