Caffey v. Best et al
| Allen Neely Caffey |
| Best, Berry, Brown, Eilts, Unknown Party 2 and Unknown Party 5 |
| 3:2013cv03296 |
| August 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION: Plaintiff's Motions 44 45 are DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 48 is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. The motion is granted as it relates to Plaintiff's conditions-of-confinement cl aim and claims against the Defendants in their official capacities. The motion is denied as to all other claims and defendants. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B), this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Schanzle-Haskins for a settlement conference. Clerk is directed to notify Judge Schanzle-Haskins' chambers of this referral. Judge Schanzle-Haskins' chambers will contact the parties to schedule the settlement conference. The Court will address Defendants' Motion to Continue Trial Date 53 after the settlement conference. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 1/23/2017. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
11
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/18/2013. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
