Blakes v. Baker et al
| Michael Blakes |
| Dr. Baker, Steele and Bradbury |
| 3:2013cv03307 |
| August 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Brown |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 75 is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. All pending motions not addressed below are denied as moot, a nd this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. Plaintiff remains responsible for the $350.00 filing fee. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(4). SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/9/2016. (MJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies is DENIED 39 . Pursuant to this ruling, discovery on the merits is no longer stayed. Discovery on the merits shall be completed by February 23, 20 15. Dispositive Motions shall be filed by March 23, 2015. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Extension of Time is DENIED as moot 48 . Plaintiff renews his Motion to Request Counsel 34 . The Plaintiff has no constitutional or statutory right to cou nsel in this case. However, for the reasons stated in the Court's text order dated June 13, 2014, Plaintiff appears competent to litigate the case himself. Furthermore, Plaintiff's response to the present motion included relevant references to fact and law, and coherently argued his legal position. 34 is DENIED. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 1/22/2015. (MJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
6
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: 1) The clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures; 2) Plaintiff's motion for appointed counsel is denied (d/e 4 ). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/28/2013. (ME, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
