Walker v. Jumper et al
Ronald Walker |
Shan Jumper, Aimee Wilczynski, Shelly Ganz, Angie Guss, Tanisha Hankerson, Kenneth Queen, Nicole Sandford, Sharlene Caraway, Amy Louck, .. Schroeder and Any and all other defendants discovered through the course of discovery to have participated in the events and actions complained of |
3:2014cv03029 |
January 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Schuyler |
Sue E. Myerscough |
Springfield Magistrate Judge |
Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/18/2014. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is GRANTED. The Plaintiff is directed to file, within 14 days of the date of this Order, his trust fund ledgers f or the six months preceding the filing of this suit so that the Court can determine the amount, if any, of his reduced payment. Failure to comply with the Court's Order could result in the Court denying the Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to a review of the Complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiff states a Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against Defendants for failure to offer treatment during his confinement with IDHS. This case is now in the process of service.(MAS, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.