Scott v. Ore et al
Dennis Scott |
Alice Ore, Wanda Pennock, Amy Wessel, James R Morton and Rose Taylor |
3:2014cv03271 |
August 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Schuyler |
Sue E. Myerscough |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is granted 2 . The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel is denied with leave to renew. 3 (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 1/14/2015. (GL, ilcd) |
Filing 7 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/20/2014. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as a violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Plaintiff must file an amended complaint in compliance with this court order on or before November 14, 2014. If the Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by this deadline or ignores the court's specific directions, his case may be dismissed. The clerk of the court is to provide the Plaintiff with a blank complaint form to assist him and reset a merit review deadline for December 1, 2014.(DM, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.