Gragg v. Thoron et al
| Micheal W Gragg |
| Jason Thoron, Diana Johnson, Sharon Barnes and Wayne Tripp |
| 3:2014cv03315 |
| October 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
OPINION: ITT Tech's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Compel Arbitration (d/e 34 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (d/e 27 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed.R.Civ.Pro 12(b)(3). Plaintiffs must file for arbitration to pursue their claims. The case is CLOSED. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 2/29/2016. (MJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION: The Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 18 , 21 are GRANTED. The Graggs' Second Amended Complaint 9 is DISMISSED, and Defendants Jason Thoron, Diana Johnson, and Sharon Barnes are TERMINATED from this case. The Graggs may file a n amended complaint excluding these Defendants and instead bringing their claims against ITT Tech by March 27, 2015. The Court notes, however, that the Graggs may only bring Section 504 claims against ITT Tech if they can establish that ITT Tech is a recipient of federal funds. If the Graggs do not file an amended complaint by March 27, this case will be closed. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/12/2015. (GL, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
