Franklin v. Scheighart et al
| Daniel Franklin |
| Karen Scheighart, Carol Andrews, Amy Bolen, Anissa Baunach, Kimberly Green, Christina Ballanger, Janine Holmes, Jocelyn Forrest, Kimberly Swenka, Harvey Daniels and Zhihong Zhang |
| 3:2014cv03387 |
| December 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the entry of this order to file an amended complaint with r espect to the deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, access to the courts, and retaliation claims. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Plaintif f's amended complaint will replace Plaintiff's original complaint in its entirety. Accordingly, the amended complaint must contain all allegations against all Defendants. Piecemeal amendments are not accepted. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/23/2015. (MJ, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
