U.S. Bank National Association et al v. Londrigan, Potter & Randle, P.C. et al
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee, successor-in-interest to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, for the Registered Holders of Credi and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of the Mezz Cap Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C5 |
Londrigan, Potter & Randle, P.C., Perkins Coie, Scott & Scott, P.C. and Sgro, Hanrahan, Durr & Rabin, LLP |
3:2015cv03195 |
June 29, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Sangamon |
Richard Mills |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Other Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 260 OPINION: Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and for Certification of Judgment for Appeal under Rule 54(b) [d/e 257] is GRANTED. Because there is no just reason to delay entry of a final judgment as to fewer than all claims or parties, the Court's Final Opinion and Judgment is hereby certified as a final order pursuant to Rule 54(b). SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 7/7/2021. (ME) |
Filing 248 OPINION BY RICHARD MILLS, United States District Judge. See written Opinion. Entered on 3/15/2021. (MJC) |
Filing 235 OPINION: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to Rule 15(b) (d/e 214 ) is DENIED. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 8/30/2019. (ME, ilcd) |
Filing 211 OPINION BY RICHARD MILLS, United States District Judge: The motion of Defendants for leave to file a motion for summary judgment on behalf of members as to Counts VI, VII and VIII (d/e 166 ) is DENIED. The Clerk will terminate the motion for partial summary judgment on behalf of Members as to Counts VI, VII and VIII (d/e 167 ). The Plaintiffs' motion in limine regarding Constructive Members lack of standing to pursue UFTA claims (d/e 179 ) is DENIED. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered on 4/26/2019. (MJC, ilcd) |
Filing 208 OPINION BY RICHARD MILLS, United States District Judge: The motion in limine of Defendants EEI Holding Corporation and Egizii Property Managers, LLC (d/e 181 ) is DENIED, as provided in this Order. The motion in limine of Defendant Springfield Prair ie Properties, LLC (d/e 182 ) is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part, as provided in this Order. The motion in limine of Defendant Robert W. Egizii and Defendant Members Thomas Egizii, Michael Egizii, Rodney Egizii, Jodi Baptist and John Pruitt (d/e 183 ) is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part, as provided in this Order. The Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file instanter a sur-reply to Defendants' motion in limine (d/e 200 ) is DENIED. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered on 4/24/2019. (MJC, ilcd) |
Filing 207 OPINION by Judge Richard Mills entered on 04/18/2019. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Plaintiffs' motion in limine to preclude the testimony of Borrower's Expert Donald Wright (d/e 180 ) is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is Allowed to the extent it relates to Counts I and IV. The motion is otherwise Denied. (DM, ilcd) |
Filing 205 OPINION BY RICHARD MILLS, United States District Judge: The Plaintiffs' motion in limine to bar evidence or argument related to the affirmative defense of laches (d/e 176 ) is ALLOWED in part. The motion is allowed to the extent that such evidence or argument is barred as it relates to the breach of contract claims asserted in Counts I, II, III and IV. The motion is otherwise Denied. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered on 4/15/2019. (MJC, ilcd) |
Filing 187 OPINION BY RICHARD MILLS, United States District Judge: The Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defense Expert Don Wright's Report (d/e 123 ) is DENIED as Moot.The Plaintiffs' motion to bar Defense Expert Don Wright's testimony at trial (d/e 123 ) is DENIED with leave to refile. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered on 3/27/2019. (MJC, ilcd) |
Filing 174 OPINION BY RICHARD MILLS, United States District Judge: the Plaintiffs' motion for entry of an Order dismissing the Law Firm Defendants with prejudice and/or certifying the Court's denial of Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint (d/e 164 ) is DENIED. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered on 3/6/2019. (MJC, ilcd) |
Filing 173 OPINION: The Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability on Counts I and IV (d/e 78 ) is GRANTED. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 2/28/2019. (MJC, ilcd) |
Filing 36 OPINION BY RICHARD MILLS, U.S. District Judge: The Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of Appeal pursuant to Rule 54(b) (d/e 30 ) is DENIED. The Court's Opinion and Order of August 15, 2016 (d/e 28 ) is not a final judgment and may be appealed following the issuance of a judgment in this consolidated action. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 10/25/2016. (MJC, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: U.S. Bank National Association et al v. Londrigan, Potter & Randle, P.C. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee, successor-in-interest to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, for the Registered Holders of Credi | |
Represented By: | Cara M Houck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of the Mezz Cap Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C5 | |
Represented By: | Cara M Houck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Londrigan, Potter & Randle, P.C. | |
Represented By: | James R Potter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Perkins Coie | |
Represented By: | David Jason Gold |
Represented By: | David M Neff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Scott & Scott, P.C. | |
Represented By: | R Stephen Scott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sgro, Hanrahan, Durr & Rabin, LLP | |
Represented By: | Gregory P Sgro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.