Coleman v. Korte et al
| Anthony J Coleman, Jr |
| Jeff Korte, Penny Ruiz, Donald Stolworthy, Timothy Megginson, Malea Harney, Tara Goins, Julia Vincent, Steve Schutte, Jane Doe and . Teel |
| 3:2015cv03209 |
| July 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Brown |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 01/05/2018. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 36 is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against P laintiff. All pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. Plaintiff remains responsible for the $350.00 filing fee. Defendant Nurse Jane Doe is dismissed without prejudice for Pl aintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Scheduling Order. Clerk is directed to terminate Defendant Nurse Jane Doe. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the en try of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (4). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis MUST identify the issues the Plaintiff will present on appeal to assist the court in determining whether the appeal is taken in good faith. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c); see also Celske v Edwards, 164 F.3d 396, 398 (7th Cir. 1999)(an appellant should be given an opportunity to submit a statement of his grounds for appealing so that the district judge "can make a reasonable assessment of the issu e of good faith."); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 632 (7th Cir. 2000)(providing that a good faith appeal is an appeal that "a reasonable person could supposehas some merit" from a legal perspective). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal.(DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
29
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/21/16. Defendant Teel's Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies 22 is GRANTED. Defendant Teel is dismissed from this lawsuit without prejudice. Clerk is directed to terminate Defendant Teel.(SW, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
8
MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/20/2015. Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states Eighth Amendment claims for failure to protect against Defendant Megginson and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against Defendant Jane Doe and Defendant Teel. Plaintiff is given 30 days to file an amended complaint to include more facts regarding his procedural due process claim. Defendants Vinc ent, Schutte, Ruiz, Stolworthy, Goins and Harney are dismissed. Defendant Korte shall remain a defendant at this time for purposes of identifying Defendant Jane Doe. Plaintiff's Motion, d/e 5 is DENIED with leave to renew. This case is now in the process of service. Rule 16 Deadline 12/21/2015. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
