Walker v. Korte et al
| Tyler Walker |
| Jeffery Korte, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #5, Tara Goins, John Doe #6, Mountain, Rine, Albert, Miller and Dodds |
| 3:2015cv03318 |
| November 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Brown |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MERIT REVIEW-AMENDED COMPLAINT entered by Judge Sara Darrow on 7/28/2017. 1. This case shall proceed solely on the excessive force claims against Defendants Myers, Evens and Habrich; the unconstitutional strip search by Defendants Evens and Habrich; the failure to intervene by Defendants Korte and Adams; and retaliation by Defendants Mountain, Rine, Albert, Dodds and Miller. Any claims not identified will not be included in the case, except in the Court's discretion upon motion by a party for good cause shown, or by leave of court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. 2. K. Evens and B. Habrich are to be substituted for Doe Defendants #3 and #4. Doe Defendant #6 and the 42 newly named Defendants are DISMISSED. Defendant Korte is to be reinstated and Defendant Robert Adams is to be added as a Defendant. 3. The Clerk is directed to send waivers of service to Defendants Korte and Adams. (LN, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
10
MERIT REVIEW OPINION - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 1/5/2016. Rule 16 Deadline 3/7/2016. See written Order. The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to attempt service on the defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied 4 with leave to renew upon demonstrating that he made attempts to hire his own counsel. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). This typically requires writing to several lawyers and attaching the responses. If Plaintiff renews his motion, he should set forth how far he has gone in school, any jobs he has held inside and outside of prison, any classes he has taken in prison, and any prior litigation experience he has. (LN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
