Rankin v. Baker et al
Plaintiff: Swaysey Rankin
Defendant: . Baker, Jeff Korte and Wexford Health Sources Inc
Case Number: 3:2016cv03138
Filed: May 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Brown
Presiding Judge: James E. Shadid
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 64 OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 3/7/2018. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. The second motion for an extension of the dispositive motion by Defendants Baker, et al., is denied as moot (d/e 52) because the third motion for an extension was granted. 2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted. (d/e's 43, 59.) The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. All other pending motions, if any, are denied as moot, a nd this case is closed, with the parties to bear their own costs. All deadlines and settings on the Court's calendar are vacated, including the jury trial set for May 1, 2018. 3. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notic e of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should identify the issues Plaintiff will present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. See full written Order. Civil Case Terminated.(VH, ilcd)
October 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SECOND MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/11/2016. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted (8). The clerk is directed to enter the standard order granting Plaintiff' s in forma pauperis petition and assessing an initial partial filing fee, if not already done, and to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. (Rule 16 Deadline 12/12/2016.) See full written Opinion. (VH, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rankin v. Baker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Swaysey Rankin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: . Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Korte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?