Jones v. Baldwin et al
| Kedron Jones, Jr. |
| John R Baldwin, Marcus Hardy, Jeffery Korte, C. Watson and J. Ervin |
| 3:2016cv03143 |
| May 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Brown |
| James E. Shadid |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/26/2018. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied. (d/e 61 .) 2) Plaintiff's motions for status are moot. (d/e's 67 , 68 .) 3) A status conference by telephone is scheduled for November 7, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. The clerk is directed to issue a writ to secure Plaintiff's presence. SEE FULL WRITTEN OPINION.(JS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER & OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/21/2017. IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part as set forth above. (d/e 34 .) 2) Defendants are directed to produce the information comp elled above to Plaintiff by January 31, 2017. 3) Defendants' motion for Summary judgment is denied (d/e 43 ). 4) Defendants may renew their summary judgment motion by February 16, 2018. 5) Plaintiff's motion for status is denied as moot. (d/e 54 .) SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER & OPINION. (JRK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
11
MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 09/13/2016. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted (9). The clerk is directed to file Plaintiff's amended complaint and to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. See full written Opinion. (JS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
7
MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 06/24/2016. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff's motion for the Court to try to find pro bono counsel to represent him is denied (5), with leave to renew after Plaintiff demonstr ates that he has made reasonable efforts to find counsel on his own. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). This typically requires writing to several lawyers and attaching the responses. Plaintiff asserts that he has written law firms , but he does not say when or attach any responses. If Plaintiff renews his motion, he should set forth how far he hasgone in school, any jobs he has held inside and outside of prison, any classes he has taken in prison, and any prior litigation expe rience he has. (2) Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. (3) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by July 18, 20 16. (4) If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint or Plaintiff's amended complaint still fails to state a claim, then this action will be dismissed for failure to state a claim and a strike will be assessed against Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the amended complaint will replace the original complaint. Piecemeal amendments are notpermitted. See full written Order. (JS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
