Southard v. Barr et al
| Benny Southard |
| Wess Barr, Beck, Durr, Strayer and Brian Carey |
| 3:2017cv03070 |
| March 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
OPINION: Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied (d/e 48 ). This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Schanzle-Haskins for a settlement conference. If no settlement is reached, final pretrial and trial dates will be set. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 12/6/2018. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
7
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: The clerk is directed to substitute Brian Carey for Defendant Carry. The clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Barr, Beck, Durr, and Strayer. The clerk is directed to enter the standard order granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis petition and assessing an initial partial filing fee, if not already done, and to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Rule 16 Deadline 6/5/2017. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/5/2017. (GL, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
