Piersall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Central District Piersall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Piersall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Bradley J. Piersall
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2017cv03172
Filed:	August 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Springfield Office
County:	Christian
Presiding Judge:	Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 427
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 5, 2018	Filing 27 OPINION by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins entered on 9/5/2018. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Defendant's Agreed Motion to Award Attorney Fees (d/e 26 ) is ALLOWED. The Court awards Plaintiff Bradley J. Piersall $6,500.00 in attorney fees a nd expenses. Plaintiff has assigned the award of fees to his attorney. The Commissioner is therefore directed to pay the amount of the award that is not subject to offset directly to his attorney, Peter C. Drummond. Plaintiff's Motion for EAJA Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2412 (d/e 25 ) is DENIED as moot. (DM, ilcd)
August 15, 2018	Filing 21 OPINION Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 08/14/2018. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Plaintiff Bradley Piersall's Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 13 ) is ALLOWED; Defendant Commissioner's Motion for Summary Affirmance (d/e 18 ) is DENIED; and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings before the Social Security Administration. (DM, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 5, 2018

Filing 27 OPINION by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins entered on 9/5/2018. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Defendant's Agreed Motion to Award Attorney Fees (d/e 26 ) is ALLOWED. The Court awards Plaintiff Bradley J. Piersall $6,500.00 in attorney fees a nd expenses. Plaintiff has assigned the award of fees to his attorney. The Commissioner is therefore directed to pay the amount of the award that is not subject to offset directly to his attorney, Peter C. Drummond. Plaintiff's Motion for EAJA Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2412 (d/e 25 ) is DENIED as moot. (DM, ilcd)

August 15, 2018

Filing 21 OPINION Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 08/14/2018. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Plaintiff Bradley Piersall's Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 13 ) is ALLOWED; Defendant Commissioner's Motion for Summary Affirmance (d/e 18 ) is DENIED; and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings before the Social Security Administration. (DM, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Piersall v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bradley J. Piersall
Represented By:	Peter C Drummond
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	US ATTY-SPRINGFIELD SSA(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?