Coleman v. Brady et al
Plaintiff: Stephen Coleman
Defendant: Mark Brady and Mark Schaefer
Case Number: 3:2017cv03286
Filed: December 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Sangamon
Presiding Judge: Sue E. Myerscough
Presiding Judge: Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SECOND MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/9/2019. IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied because Plaintiff has not demonstrated reasonable efforts to find counsel on his own 9 . The Court also notes that Plaintiff's filings coherently communicate the facts giving rise to his claims. 2) Plaintiff's letters filed as motions are granted in part and denied in part 10 , 11 , 12 . The motions are granted to the extent the Court has conside red Plaintiff's arguments and allegations therein. The motions are denied to the extent Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court's first merit review order. 3) This action is dismissed with prejudice as barred by the two-year statute of limitations. 4) The clerk is directed to close this case and enter a judgment. 5) Plaintiff must still pay the full filing fee of $350 even though his case has been dismissed. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall continue to make monthl y payments to the Clerk of Court, as directed in the Court's prior order. 6) If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion fo r leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by November 13, 2018. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, then this action will be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/18/2018. (GL, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. Brady et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Brady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Schaefer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?