Coleman v. Brady et al
Stephen Coleman |
Mark Brady and Mark Schaefer |
3:2017cv03286 |
December 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Sangamon |
Sue E. Myerscough |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SECOND MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/9/2019. IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied because Plaintiff has not demonstrated reasonable efforts to find counsel on his own 9 . The Court also notes that Plaintiff's filings coherently communicate the facts giving rise to his claims. 2) Plaintiff's letters filed as motions are granted in part and denied in part 10 , 11 , 12 . The motions are granted to the extent the Court has conside red Plaintiff's arguments and allegations therein. The motions are denied to the extent Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court's first merit review order. 3) This action is dismissed with prejudice as barred by the two-year statute of limitations. 4) The clerk is directed to close this case and enter a judgment. 5) Plaintiff must still pay the full filing fee of $350 even though his case has been dismissed. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall continue to make monthl y payments to the Clerk of Court, as directed in the Court's prior order. 6) If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion fo r leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 8 MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by November 13, 2018. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, then this action will be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/18/2018. (GL, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.