Lozier v. Quincy University Corporation et al
| Daniel R Lozier, II |
| Quincy University Corporation, Christine Tracy, Sam Lathrop, Mark Bell and Brian Holzgrafe |
| 3:2018cv03077 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Adams |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
195
OPINION AND ORDER entered by Judge Sue E Myerscough on 4/4/2024: Defendant's Motion for Clarification is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant's Supplemental Motions in Limine (d/e 186 ) are DENIED. The parties' Motions for Le ave to File Document Under Seal are GRANTED (d/e 187 , 191 ). Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Uncontested Issues of Fact and Joint Stipulation of Uncontested Facts is GRANTED (d/e 193 ) and the parties are directed to file an Amended Final Pretrial Order with paragraph 9 removed. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (BL)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER entered by Judge Sue E Myerscough on 2/5/2024: Counter-Defendant Lozier's Motion to Bifurcate (d/e 154 ) is DENIED. Counter-Defendants' Motion to Realign Parties (d/e 155 ) and Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal are GRANT ED (d/e 172 ). Counter-Plaintiff Holzgrafe's Motion to Allow Remote Testimony (d/e 156 ) is GRANTED as to non-party witnesses Bell, Krass, Carlson, Anderson and Moore. Counter-Plaintiff Holzgrafe is DIRECTED to file a Reply, on or before Febru ary 16, 2024, to Mr. Lozier's response providing additional rationale as to why Mr. Prow and Mr. Vayser's testimony should be taken remotely. Counter-Plaintiff's Motions for Leave to File Document Under Seal (d/e 158 , 167 ) are GRANTED for the reasons stated in the motion.(BL)
|
|
Filing
139
OPINION AND ORDER entered by Sue E. Myerscough, U.S. District Judge on 10/6/2023: Counter Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (d/e 123 ) is GRANTED, Counter Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of the Motion to Compel (d/e 125 ) is denied as MOOT, Counter Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of the Motion to Reopen Discovery (d/e 137 ) is denied as MOOT, the Parties' Motions for Leave to File Documents Under Seal (d/e 126 , 131 , 135 ) are GRANTED. Last, Counter Defendant's Motion to Reopen Discovery (d/e 129 ), which also requests a continuance of the trial setting, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (MJC)
|
|
Filing
105
OPINION and ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/26/2022. Plaintiff, Daniel Lozier's Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 74 is DENIED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION & ORDER) (MAS)
|
|
Filing
96
OPINION AND ORDER: SEE Written Opinion and Oder. The Court finds that each of Defendant's defamation and false light invasion of privacy Counterclaims state claims on which relief may be granted. Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss (d/e 69 ) is, therefore, denied. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/5/2022. (ME)
|
|
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER : SEE WRITTEN ORDER. Defendant Holzgrafe's two state law counterclaims remain pending before the Court under the supplemental jurisdiction conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Therefore, each of Plaintiff's claims against Quincy University and Holzgrafe are dismissed as requested in Plaintiff's and Quincy University's Motion (d/e 68 ) and Plaintiff's Motion (d/e 85 ) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Furthermore, because no claims remai n against Defendant Holzgrafe, the Motion for Credits and Setoffs (d/e 79 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Finally, because the Court retains supplemental jurisdiction over Defendant Holzgrafe's counterclaims, the Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaims (d/e 89 ) is also DENIED as MOOT. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/13/2022. (ME)
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 3/15/2021. Cindy Lozier's Motion to Intervene to Modify Protective Order, d/e 61 is ALLOWED. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) (MAS)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/26/2019. Defendant Brian Holzgrafe's Motion for Leave to File Counterclaims Against Plaintiff and to file Third-Party Complaint against Cindy Lozier, d/e 45 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PAR T. The Court grants Holzgrafe leave to amend his Answer to add counterclaims for defamation and false light/invasion of privacy against Plaintiff. Holzgrafe shall file the amended Answer on or before July 3, 2019. The Court denies Holzgrafe leave to file a third-party complaint against Cindy Lozier. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 1/31/2019. The Defendants' Motion to Strike, d/e 19 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
