Cherry v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Starlla M. Cherry and Starlla M Cherry |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| CSS-Social Security Administration |
| 3:2018cv03188 |
| July 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Macoupin |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Starlla M Cherry. Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/27/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (Camp, David) |
| Filing 4 STATUS REPORT on Service by Starlla M Cherry. (Camp, David) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security (Office of Regional Counsel, SSA), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Three original summonses issued and sent to Plaintiff's counsel via U.S. mail to effectuate service. (ME, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David Danielson Camp on behalf of Starlla M. Cherry (Camp, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-2891051.), filed by Starlla M. Cherry. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons, #3 summons, #4 summons, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Camp, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
