Doe v. Macleod et al
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Margaret Burke, Todd Sexton, other as yet unidentified employees of the Illinois Department of Corrections and Richard Macleod
Case Number: 3:2018cv03191
Filed: August 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Livingston
Presiding Judge: Sue E Myerscough
Referring Judge: Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Margaret Burke waiver sent on 8/9/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Mazur, Elizabeth)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Richard Macleod waiver sent on 8/14/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Schult, Nicole)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Todd Sexton waiver sent on 8/14/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Schult, Nicole)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 First MOTION Proceed as Jane Doe by Plaintiff Jane Doe. Responses due by 8/23/2018 (Schult, Nicole)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Nicole Rae Schult on behalf of Jane Doe (Schult, Nicole)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Elizabeth N Mazur on behalf of Jane Doe (Mazur, Elizabeth)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Alan Mills on behalf of Jane Doe (Mills, Alan)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-2895324.), filed by Jane Doe.(Schult, Nicole)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Macleod et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margaret Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Sexton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: other as yet unidentified employees of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Macleod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By: Nicole Rae Schult
Represented By: Elizabeth N Mazur
Represented By: Alan Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?