Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Harker et al
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company |
Wade Harker and Linda Stodden |
3:2018cv03215 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Sue E Myerscough |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment by Linda Stodden.(Smith, S) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company. Linda Stodden served on 9/30/2018, answer due 10/22/2018. (Unsell, Jane) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company. Wade Harker served on 9/30/2018, answer due 10/22/2018. (Unsell, Jane) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Wade Harker, Linda Stodden and returned to Plaintiff's counsel to effectuate service. (ME, ilcd) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company. (Unsell, Jane) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jane E Unsell on behalf of Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company (Unsell, Jane) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wade Harker, Linda Stodden (Filing fee $ 400, 0753-2917257) filed by Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(MJC, ilcd) |
Judge Sue E. Myerscough and Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins added. (MJC, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.