Norris v. Downs, et al.
Edward Patrick Norris |
Illinois Department of Corrections, Adams County Jail Administrator, John Doe, II, Adams County Illinois, Adams County Sheriff, John Doe, I, State of Illinois and Chad Downs |
3:2019cv03156 |
June 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Colin Stirling Bruce |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Chad Downs on 8/8/2019. (SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 18 HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 8/8/2019. (SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 17 MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 8/8/2019. It is therefore ordered: 1. Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A, the court finds that the plaintiff states a Fourteenth Amendment claim for inhumane conditions of confinement against John Doe defendants. Any additional claims shall not be included in the case, except at the court's discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown or pursuant to FederalRule of Civil Procedure 15. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 15 PDF with attached Audio File. Court Date & Time [ 8/6/2019 10:16:17 AM ]. File Size [ 2137 KB ]. Run Time [ 00:04:27 ]. (admin). |
Minute Entry for proceedings held 8/6/19 before Judge Harold A. Baker. Appearance by Plaintiff Edward Norris. Merit Review Hearing held by telephone. Merits of case discussed. Written order to be entered. (Tape #UR-C 10:16 AM.) (TC, ilcd) |
Filing 16 Exhibits by Edward Patrick Norris. (KB, ilcd) |
Filing 14 MOTION to amend Defendant List by Plaintiff Edward Patrick Norris. Responses due by 8/19/2019. (ED, ilcd) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Plaintiff Edward Patrick Norris. Responses due by 8/19/2019. (ED, ilcd) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Edward Patrick Norris. Responses due by 8/19/2019 (ED, ilcd) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT by Edward Patrick Norris. (ED, ilcd) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Intervene by Plaintiff Edward Patrick Norris. Responses due by 8/19/2019 (ED, ilcd) |
Filing 9 MOTION To Add Plaintiff by Plaintiff Edward Patrick Norris. Responses due by 8/19/2019 (ED, ilcd) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Renew Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Edward Patrick Norris. Responses due by 8/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(ED, ilcd) |
Filing 7 TELEPHONE WRIT issued to Lincoln CC re Edward Patrick Norris for hearing set 8/6/2019 at 10:15 a.m. (SAG, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 7/23/2019. A merit review hearing is set for August 6, 2019, at 10:15 a.m., by telephone conference call from Urbana. The clerk is directed to issue a writ to insure plaintiff's appearance at this merit review hearing.(SAG, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/19/2019. Plaintiff filed a Motion to Request Counsel #5 . Plaintiff has no constitutional or statutory right to counsel in this case. In considering the Plaintiff's motion, the court asks: (1) has the indigent Plaintiff made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel or been effectively precluded from doing so; and if so, (2) given the difficulty of the case, does the plaintiff appear competent to litigate it himself? Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff has not shown that he made a reasonable effort to obtain counsel on his own. A plaintiff usually does this by attaching copies of letters sent to attorneys seeking representation and copies of any responses received. Plaintiff indicates he wrote 3 attorneys, but he did not identify them or attach copies of letters to his motion. Because Plaintiff has not satisfied the first prong, the Court does not address the second. Plaintiff's motion #5 is DENIED with leave to renew. (SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Edward Patrick Norris. (KE, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/25/2019 granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff`s trust fund ledgers indicate he has no funds to make an initial partial payment of the filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(4), the initial partial filing fee is waived. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month`s income credited to Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff`s account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff`s place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. (KE, ilcd) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Edward Patrick Norris. Responses due by 7/1/2019 (KE, ilcd) |
Filing 4 Letter from Clerk of the Court requesting Trust Fund Ledgers. (KE, ilcd) |
Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Edward Patrick Norris.(KE, ilcd) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Rock Island Division,131 E 4th Street, Davenport, IA 52801.Merit Review Deadline set for 7/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE, ilcd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Edward Patrick Norris. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KE, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.