Estate of Leslie Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Estate of Leslie Johnson
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections, Jason P. Crisman, Clinton D. Zoller, Bruce K. Engel, Matthew Roegge, John and Jane Does, Steve Meeks, Douglas Gooding, Todd Ham, Cameron Watson, Diana Collison and Jared R. Pearce
Case Number: 3:2020cv03054
Filed: February 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2020 Filing 68 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:18-cv-05330.
February 20, 2020 Filing 67 TRANSFERRED to the USDC Central District of Illinois the electronic record. (jjr, )
February 19, 2020 Filing 66 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Status hearing held on February 19, 2020. For the reasons stated in open court, Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue (Dckt. No. #50 ) is hereby granted. The Clerk is to transfer this case forthwith to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
February 10, 2020 Filing 65 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court sets a status hearing for February 19, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
January 31, 2020 Filing 64 REPLY by Defendants Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller to response in opposition to motion, #63 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order & Opinion; 17cv1383-JBM (C.D. IL. Feb. 1, 2018))(Robinson, James)
January 10, 2020 Filing 63 RESPONSE by Estate of Leslie Johnsonin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller #54 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. A - Indictment, #2 Exhibit Exh. B - Lippert Cmplt)(Hundley, David)
December 20, 2019 Filing 62 REPLY by Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller to response in opposition to motion, #56 (Robinson, James)
December 20, 2019 Filing 61 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The joint motion for extension of time (Dckt. No. #59 ) is hereby granted. The Court extends Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss to January 10, 2020. Defendants' reply is now due on January 31, 2020. The motion hearing set for December 24, 2019 is stricken. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Docket Text Modified by the Clerk's Office on 12/23/2019) (jjr, ).
December 20, 2019 Filing 60 Joint [Agreed] NOTICE of Motion by David M. Hundley for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply #59 before Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 12/26/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Hundley, David)
December 20, 2019 Filing 59 MOTION by Plaintiff Estate of Leslie Johnson for extension of time to file response/reply as to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #54 [JOINT/AGREED MOTION] (Hundley, David)
December 18, 2019 Filing 58 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller by James Robinson CORRECTED (Robinson, James)
December 17, 2019 Filing 57 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller by James Robinson (Robinson, James)
December 12, 2019 Filing 56 RESPONSE by Estate of Leslie Johnsonin Opposition to MOTION by Defendants Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller to transfer case #50 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. A, #2 Exhibit Exh. B, #3 Exhibit Exh. C)(Hundley, David)
November 21, 2019 Filing 55 MEMORANDUM by Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #54 (Williams, Alan)
November 21, 2019 Filing 54 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller (Williams, Alan)
November 14, 2019 Filing 53 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Motion hearing held on November 14, 2019. Counsel discussed Defendants' motion to transfer the case [Dckt. No. #50 ]. Plaintiff informed the Court that it would like to file a response to the motion to transfer. Plaintiff's response to the motion to transfer is due on December 12, 2019. Defendants' reply is due on December 20, 2019. In light of Defendants' pending motion to transfer, this Court strikes the previously-ordered obligation of Plaintiff to file a memorandum by November 14, 2019, addressing venue and a potential transfer [Dckt. No. #46 ]. Upon request from the Defendants, the Court extends Defendants' motion to dismiss deadline to November 21, 2019. Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss is due by December 20. Defendants' reply is due on January 10, 2020. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
November 12, 2019 Filing 52 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Motion by Defendants to file an oversized brief in support of their motion to dismiss [Dckt. No. #47 ] is hereby granted. In the interest of fair play, this Court also grants Plaintiff leave to file a response brief of equal length. The hearing set for Nov. 14, 2019 remains in place in light of the other pending motion, namely, defendants' motion to transfer. [Dckt. No. #50 ]. The Court reminds the parties that they need to file a notice of motion for each separate motion, or at the very least, refer to each pending motion in a notice of motion. Here, defendants filed a notice of motion [Dckt. No. #48 ] for the motion to file an oversized brief [Dckt. No. #47 ], but not the motion to transfer [Dckt. No. #50 ]. The Court will treat the notice of motion [Dckt. No. #48 ] to cover both pending motions. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
November 7, 2019 Filing 51 MEMORANDUM by Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller in support of motion to transfer case #50 (Williams, Alan)
November 7, 2019 Filing 50 MOTION by Defendants Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller to transfer case (Williams, Alan)
November 7, 2019 Filing 49 Defendants' Notice to the Court by Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller (Williams, Alan)
November 7, 2019 Filing 48 NOTICE of Motion by Alan Williams for presentment of motion for leave to file, #47 before Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 11/14/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Williams, Alan)
November 7, 2019 Filing 47 MOTION by Defendants Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller for leave to file an oversized brief (Unopposed Motion) (Williams, Alan)
October 24, 2019 Filing 46 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Status hearing held October 24, 2019. Counsel discussed the Initial Status Report for Reassigned Case. Counsel addressed the question whether venue is proper in the Northern District of Illinois and whether this case should be transferred to the Central District of Illinois. By November 7, 2019, Defendants must file a statement disclosing, on a defendant-by-defendant basis, the judicial district where each Defendant resides. By November 14, 2019, the Plaintiff must file a memorandum addressing both (1) whether venue is proper in the Northern District of Illinois, and (2) whether this case should be transferred to the Central District of Illinois. By December 3, 2019, Defendants must file a response to Plaintiff's memorandum, if they wish. Defendants are free to file a motion to transfer the case before Plaintiff files the memorandum on November 14, 2019. If Defendants file a motion to transfer before that date, the briefing schedule will follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the Local Rules, and Judge Seeger's Standing Order. Given the possibility of transferring this case, the Court hereby stays all disclosures required under the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Program. Counsel also raised the issue of setting deadlines for responding to the complaint and a briefing schedule for Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss. The Court orders Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Dckt. No. #40 ) by November 14. If Defendants file a motion to dismiss, Plaintiff must respond to the motion by December 12, 2019, and Defendants must reply by December 19. If Defendants file a motion to dismiss, they need not file an answer by November 14, 2019; instead, Defendants' answer will be due as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Concerning discovery, the Court hereby stays any obligation to submit a Rule 26(f) report, but the parties are free to issue discovery requests. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
October 18, 2019 Filing 45 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger:The initial status hearing is hereby set before Judge Steven C. Seeger on October 24, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 1725. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
October 1, 2019 Filing 44 STATUS Report (Parties' Joint Status Report) by Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller (Williams, Alan)
September 23, 2019 Filing 43 STANDING ORDER dated 9/23/19: This Standing Order applies to all civil cases reassigned to the calendar of District Judge Steven C. Seeger. All previously-set status or motion hearing dates are vacated. Any trials set for September 23, 2019 through October 31, 2019 are cancelled and will be re-set by the Court. Unless otherwise ordered, all other previously-set deadlines and schedules remain intact. The Court will set a date for a reassignment status conference after the parties have filed the joint status report. The Court will address already-pending motions at that conference. The parties are directed not to notice or re-notice any motions, with the exception of emergency motions, before appearing at the reassignment status conference. All emergency motions arising before September 30, 2019 should be noticed before the emergency judge. For all emergency motions arising after September 30, 2019, but before the date of the reassignment conference, the parties are directed to contact chambers at (312) 435-5588. Emergency matters must be true emergencies, meaning that a delay in hearing them would cause serious and irreparable harm to one or more of the parties. To help the Court learn about the case, counsel shall confer, prepare, and file a joint status report by October 1, 2019. If defense counsel has not yet filed an appearance, plaintiff's counsel should prepare the status report. The report shall contain the information requested in the Initial Status Report For Reassigned Case. A Word version of the Initial Status Report is available on Judge Seeger's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The parties must deliver two (2) copies of the Initial Status Report to the courtroom deputy's drop-box outside room 1728 by October 2, 2019. (See order for further details.) Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 9/23/2019: Mailed notice. (sm, )
September 16, 2019 Filing 42 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: GENERAL ORDER 19-0029 - Pursuant that to the Executive Committee Order entered on September 12, 2019 the civil cases on the attached list have been selected for reassignment to form the initial calendar of the Honorable Steven Seeger; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of 342 cases be reassigned to the Honorable Steven Seeger; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review the Honorable Stevens webpage on the Courts website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any civil case that has been reassigned pursuant to this Order will not be randomly reassigned to create the initial calendar of a new district judge for twelve months from the date of this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable Steven Seeger to the Courts civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that he shall receive a full share of such cases.. Case reassigned to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger for all further proceedings. Honorable John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 9/16/2019.(aee, )
September 11, 2019 Filing 40 Second AMENDED complaint by Estate of Leslie Johnson against Diana M. Collison, Jason P. Crisman, John and Jane Does, Bruce K. Engel, Douglas Gooding, Todd M. Ham, Steve Meeks, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson, Clinton D. Zoller (Marsh, Jordan)
September 10, 2019 Filing 41 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 9/10/2019. Oral motion for leave to file amended complaint is granted and shall be filed on or before 9/13/2019. Status hearing set for 9/18/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
September 6, 2019 Filing 39 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Estate of Leslie Johnson by Jordan Marsh (Marsh, Jordan)
August 28, 2019 Filing 38 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Diana M. Collison, Douglas Gooding, Clinton D. Zoller by Alan Williams (Williams, Alan)
August 7, 2019 Filing 37 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Jason P. Crisman, Bruce K. Engel, Todd M. Ham, Jared R. Pearce, Matthew Roegge, Cameron Watson by Alan Williams (Williams, Alan)
July 26, 2019 Filing 36 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Steve Meeks by Alan Williams (Williams, Alan)
July 25, 2019 Filing 35 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 7/25/2019. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve defendants prior to the next hearing. Status hearing set for 9/10/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice. (cc, )
July 24, 2019 Filing 34 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Estate of Leslie Johnson as to Steve Meeks on 7/17/2019, answer due 8/7/2019. (Hundley, David)
July 24, 2019 Filing 33 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Defendant Steve Meeks , SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Estate of Leslie Johnson as to Steve Meeks. (Hundley, David)
June 12, 2019 Filing 32 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 6/12/2019 and continued to 7/25/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
June 10, 2019 Filing 31 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: An audit was performed on cases filed that allege unconstitutional conditions of confinement by a prisoner or former prisoner. Based on this review, this matter is more properly designated as a Nature of Suit 555 (Prison Conditions). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to change the Nature of Suit to 555. No further action is needed by the parties. Mailed notice (gel, )
May 28, 2019 Filing 30 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Oral motion to reset status hearing is granted. Status hearing previously set for 5/30/2019 is reset for 6/12/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
April 11, 2019 Filing 29 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 4/11/2019. The Department of Corrections is ordered to release last known addresses to plaintiff's counsel, as attorney eyes only, as stated on the record. Status hearing set for 5/30/2019 at 9:45 a.m.in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
February 13, 2019 Filing 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 2/13/2019 and continued to 4/11/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
February 1, 2019 Filing 27 First AMENDED complaint by Estate of Leslie Johnson against All Defendants and terminating Illinois Department of Corrections (Hundley, David)
January 24, 2019 Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Case called for a status hearing on 1/24/2019. Plaintiff initially failed to appear and failed to notify Chambers of any scheduling conflicts thus the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. Plaintiff's counsel ultimately arrived late after the case was called. The dismissal for want of prosecution is now vacated. Oral motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint is granted and shall be filed on or before 2/1/2019. Plaintiff's counsel is warned that if an amended complaint is not filed by 2/1/2019, this case will be dismissed with prejudice. Defendant's motion to dismiss #24 is denied without prejudice. Status hearing previously set for 2/13/2019, to stand. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 17, 2019 Filing 25 NOTICE of Motion by Nicholas Scott Staley for presentment of motion to dismiss/lack of prosecution #24 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/24/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Staley, Nicholas)
January 17, 2019 Filing 24 MOTION by Defendant Illinois Department of Corrections to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Staley, Nicholas)
December 20, 2018 Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for extension of time to file first amended complaint #21 is granted, and Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by 1/10/18. The 1/8/19 Notice of Motion date is stricken, and the parties need not appear. Additionally, the status hearing previously set for 1/16/19 is stricken and reset for 2/13/19 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
December 13, 2018 Filing 22 [Unopposed] NOTICE of Motion by David M. Hundley for presentment of motion for extension of time to amend #21 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/8/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Hundley, David)
December 13, 2018 Filing 21 MOTION by Plaintiff Estate of Leslie Johnson for extension of time to amend complaint #1 Unopposed (Hundley, David)
November 30, 2018 Filing 20 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/30/2018. Mailed notice(gel, )
November 30, 2018 Filing 19 HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/30/2018. Mailed notice(gel, )
November 29, 2018 Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 11/29/2018. Oral motion to extend deadline to file amended complaint, is granted. Any amended complaint shall be filed on or before 12/13/2018. The parties' joint motion for entry of an agreed HIPAA order #17 is granted. Enter Agreed HIPAA Qualified Protective Order. The parties' joint motion for entry of a confidentiality order #16 is also granted, and the Court accepts Defendants' proposed order. Enter Confidentiality Order. Status hearing set for 1/16/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
November 28, 2018 Filing 17 MOTION by Plaintiff Estate of Leslie Johnson for protective order [Joint Agreed Motion for HIPAA Order] (Hundley, David)
November 28, 2018 Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Estate of Leslie Johnson for protective order [Joint Motion] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh A - Def Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Exh B - Pltf Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Exh C - Redlined Proposed Order)(Hundley, David)
November 5, 2018 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In light of proceedings on Defendant's motion to dismiss, the initial status conference previously set for 11/7/18 is stricken, and the parties need not appear. The 11/29/18 status hearing date stands. Mailed notice (gel, )
October 16, 2018 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on 10/16/2018. Defendant's motion to dismiss and motion to change venue #10 is denied without prejudice. Any amended complaint shall be filed on or before 11/29/2018. Status hearing set for 11/29/2018 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
October 9, 2018 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on 10/9/2018 and continued to 10/16/2018 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
October 4, 2018 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 . Plaintiff is advised to review the Courts standing order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Courts homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The Court's Order requires Plaintiff to make an election as to whether he/she will amend the complaint or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 is set for 10/9/2018. Plaintiff shall be prepared to make an election regarding Defendant's motion to dismiss at the next hearing. Mailed notice (gel, )
September 26, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Nicholas Scott Staley for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, motion to change venue #10 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/9/2018 at 09:45 AM. (Staley, Nicholas)
September 26, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Illinois Department of Corrections , MOTION by Defendant Illinois Department of Corrections to change venue (Staley, Nicholas)
September 24, 2018 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Illinois Department of Corrections by Nicholas Scott Staley (Staley, Nicholas)
September 20, 2018 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff having now filed the initial status report required by the Court's prior order, this case is hereby reinstated. The case is set for an initial status conference on 11/7/18 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. The parties shall file a joint status report by 10/31/18. Mailed notice (gel, )
September 19, 2018 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff having now filed the initial status report required by the Court's prior order, this case is hereby reinstated. The case is set for an initial status conference on 11/7/18 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. The parties shall file an initial status report by 10/31/18. Mailed notice (cn).
September 17, 2018 Filing 6 STATUS Report Initial by Estate of Leslie Johnson (Hundley, David)
September 17, 2018 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution based upon the parties' failure to file the status report required by the Courts prior order #4 . For questions concerning the dismissal of this case or the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project, the parties should immediately call Judge Blakey's chambers at (312) 435-6058. The 9/20/18 initial status conference is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
August 6, 2018 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP%20Standing%20Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDPs intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Courts own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 9/20/2018 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 9/10/2018, using the model template set forth in this Courts standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, )
August 6, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, )
August 6, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. (jn, )
August 3, 2018 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Estate of Leslie Johnson by David M. Hundley (Hundley, David)
August 3, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Estate of Leslie Johnson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14779970. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hundley, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estate of Leslie Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estate of Leslie Johnson
Represented By: Jordan Eric Marsh
Represented By: David M Hundley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections
Represented By: Nicholas S Staley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason P. Crisman
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clinton D. Zoller
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce K. Engel
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Roegge
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Meeks
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas Gooding
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Ham
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cameron Watson
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diana Collison
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jared R. Pearce
Represented By: James Robinson
Represented By: Alan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?