Hoedebecke v. The City of Springfield, et al
| Cory Hoedebecke |
| Rhet Spengel and The City of Springfield |
| 3:2020cv03057 |
| February 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Rhet Spengel, The City of Springfield.(Zimmerman, John)
|
|
NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set Thursday, 5/28/2020, at 10:00 AM (court will place call) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Attorneys are directed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) by meeting as soon as practicable, and in any event at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference, and are to submit a proposed discovery plan in writing to the Court on or before 5/26/2020. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(F) with proposed deadlines. The parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of electronically stored information, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, concerning discovery of electronically stored information. If a discovery plan is not submitted as required, the scheduling hearing will not be held and costs may be assessed. Lead counsel or other counsel of record with knowledge of the case should be available to participate in the Rule 16 scheduling hearing. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendants' Motion to Extend Time for Response to Plaintiff's Complaint #7 is ALLOWED. Extension granted to 4/26/2020. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing 7
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendants Rhet Spengel, The City of Springfield. Responses due by 3/31/2020 (Zimmerman, John)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by John Michael Zimmerman on behalf of Rhet Spengel (Zimmerman, John)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Steven C Rahn on behalf of The City of Springfield (Rahn, Steven)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by John Michael Zimmerman on behalf of The City of Springfield (Zimmerman, John)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cory Hoedebecke. Rhet Spengel served on 2/26/2020, answer due 3/18/2020. (Schlosser, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cory Hoedebecke. The City of Springfield served on 2/26/2020, answer due 3/18/2020. (Schlosser, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3315815.), filed by Cory Hoedebecke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schlosser, Frederick)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
