Rossmiller v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
| Wanda Rossmiller |
| C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc |
| 3:2020cv03078 |
| March 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Richard Mills |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/13/22 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom A in Urbana before Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. (TC, ilcd) |
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 5/5/20. Fact Discovery due by 4/1/2021. Plaintiff's Expert Disclosure due by 5/14/2021. Defendant's Expert Disclosure due by 6/30/2021. Motions due by 1/20/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/13/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom A in Urbana before Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Jury Selection/Jury Trial set for 7/12/2022 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A in Urbana before Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Status Conference set for 7/13/2020 at 10:45 AM by telephone from Urbana (court will place call) before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long. See written Order for additional deadlines. (Attachments: #1 Consent Packet) (TC, ilcd) (Main Document 14 replaced on 5/7/20 to correct caption and time of final pretrial) (TC, ilcd).
|
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - D)(Elster, Jason) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc. (Elster, Jason) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David Todd Mathews on behalf of Wanda Rossmiller (Mathews, David) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 4/16/20. The Court directs the parties to file a joint proposed scheduling order within 14 days. (Proposed scheduling order due by 4/30/20.) (TC, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER: This case is reassigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce for all further proceedings. Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 4/15/20. (MC, ilcd)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Substitute Attorney, Richard North, Jr. to be replaced by Lori G. Cohen, Jason B. Elster and Monica S. Harris, [Unopposed] by Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc. Responses due by 4/23/2020 (Elster, Jason) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Monica Santana Harris on behalf of Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc (Harris, Monica) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jason B Elster on behalf of Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc (Elster, Jason) |
| TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Record Withdrawal Following Remand #10 is ALLOWED. Attorney Richard B. North, Jr. is terminated as counsel for Defendants in this case. (LB, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. This case has been opened in the Central District of Illinois after having been transferred by the MDL Court, District of Arizona. Some discovery has been completed. Counsel is directed to e-file a proposed discovery plan for the remaining discovery in writing to the Court on or before June 15, 2020. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(F) with proposed deadlines. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, for additional discovery of electronically stored information (ESI) not already accomplished in the MDL proceeding. If additional ESI is needed, the parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of ESI, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. After the Court's review of the discovery plan, the Court will enter the appropriate scheduling order or set the matter for telephonic conference. Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 03/31/2020. (SKN, ilcd)
|
| Filing 7 MDL Remark: Transfer Document(s) received from District of Arizona. (Attachments: #1 Part 2) (SKN, ilcd) Modified on 3/27/2020 to amend wording (SKN, ilcd). |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:16-cv-01010. . |
| Remark - Case transferred to the Central District of Illinois via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) |
|
Filing 5
SECOND AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD). See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 3/20/20. [Amending to Remove Case: Lisa Riley v. C. R. Bard, Inc., 2:18-cv-00896-NV from page 25 of Schedule B] (MAP)
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (THIRD)--See document for details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 3/6/20. (SJF)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER. (Third) See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 3/4/20. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 3/4/20. (MAP) Modified on 3/25/2020 o terminate motion (SKN, ilcd).
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-12842701 filed by Wanda Rossmiller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LSP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
