Yeager v. Owsley
Plaintiff: Amanda Yeager
Defendant: Shane Owsley
Case Number: 3:2020cv03246
Filed: September 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Richard Mills
Referring Judge: Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Shane Owsley. Shane Owsley waiver sent on 10/9/2020, answer due 12/8/2020. (Grodsky, Eric)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Eric S Grodsky on behalf of Shane Owsley (Grodsky, Eric)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Owsley on 10/9/2020. (GL, ilcd)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. On 9/21/2020, the Court directed pro se Plaintiff to provide an address at which Defendant could be served with notice or summons. Plaintiff has complied. See Response #3 . Clerk is directed to send notice of lawsuit waiver of service forms to the Defendant at the address provided by Plaintiff along with a copy of the Complaint, two copies of the waiver form, and a prepaid envelope to return the form by first class mail to the Clerk. If the Defendant fails to sign and return a waiver within 30 days from the date said forms were sent, the Court will direct personal service by the U.S. Marshal at the Defendant's expense. Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 10/7/2020. (GL, ilcd)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Response by Amanda Yeager to Text Order of 9/21/2020 to provide Defendant's address. (GL, ilcd)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 . For good cause shown, motion #2 is ALLOWED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send notice of lawsuit waiver of service forms to the Defendant, however pro se Plaintiff did not provide an address for Defendant in her Complaint. On or before 10/5/2020, Plaintiff is directed to provide in writing to the Office of the Clerk an address at which Defendant may be served with notice or summons. Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 9/21/2020. (GL, ilcd)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Amanda Yeager. Responses due by 10/2/2020. (GL, ilcd)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shane Owsley, filed by Amanda Yeager. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GL, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yeager v. Owsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Yeager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shane Owsley
Represented By: Eric S Grodsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?