Smith et al v. United States of America et al
Plaintiff: Michael W Smith and Joshua D Warner
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 3:2020cv03342
Filed: December 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2021 Filing 8 Letter from Michael W Smith requesting Status of Case. (KE, ilcd)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 12/30/2020. On December 23, 2020, Plaintiffs Michael W. Smith and Joshua D. Warner filed this lawsuit asserting a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. However, Plaintiffs Smith and Warner filed a nearly identical case on December 14, 2020, with the Court asserting the same claim under the FTCA. See CDIL Case Number 20-4264. The Court can see no appreciable difference between the two Complaints. Therefore, the Court will dismiss this case as being redundant of Case Number 20-4264 because this case is the latter one filed in time. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. All pending motions are denied as moot. No judgment to enter.(KB, ilcd)
December 28, 2020 Filing 7 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Michael W Smith. (KE, ilcd)
December 28, 2020 Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Joshua D Warner. (KE, ilcd)
December 28, 2020 Filing 5 Letter from Clerk of the Court requesting Trust Fund Ledgers. (KE, ilcd)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 12/28/2020. This Court has instituted a reduced payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment is assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $402 filing fee).Income includes all deposits from any source. The plaintiff Joshua D. Warner is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. However, the plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $1.00 or less. No reduced filing fee will be assessed. (KE, ilcd)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 12/28/2020. This Court has instituted a reduced payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment is assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $402 filing fee).Income includes all deposits from any source. The plaintiff Michael W. Smith is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. However, the plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $1.00 or less. No reduced filing fee will be assessed. (KE, ilcd)
December 23, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael W Smith. Responses due by 1/6/2021 (KE, ilcd)
December 23, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Joshua D Warner. Responses due by 1/6/2021 (KE, ilcd)
December 23, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 1/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE, ilcd)
December 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joshua D Warner, Michael W Smith.(KE, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith et al v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael W Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua D Warner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?