Chandler-Martin v. Chenoworth et al
| Reginald Chandler-Martin |
| . Collins, Health Care Agents, . Watson, Other Municipal Agents and . Chenoworth |
| 3:2021cv03062 |
| March 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Remark: Complaint form attached pursuant to Merit Review Order. (SAG) |
Filing 6
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 4/30/2021. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim based on which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. 2) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied with leave to renew. #5 . 3) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint clarifying his claims within 21 days or on or before May 21, 2021. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint on or before May 21, 2021 or ignores the Court's directions in this order, his case will be dismissed. 4) The Clerk is to provide Plaintiff with a blank complaint form to assist him and reset the internal merit review deadline within 30 days. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG)
|
| Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 3/17/2021, in the amount of $ 27.40; receipt number 34626012414. (GL) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 3/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $27.40. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month`s income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. Plaintiff is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the initial partial filing fee and required monthly payments are made. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Prisoner Prepayment due by 4/5/2021. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 3/5/2021. (SAG)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Reginald Chandler-Martin. Responses due by 3/18/2021 (SAG) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Reginald Chandler-Martin (SAG) (Main Document 4 replaced on 3/5/2021) (SAG). |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Reginald Chandler-Martin.(SAG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Reginald Chandler-Martin.(SAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
