LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
Plaintiff: LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC.
Defendant: Office of the Attorney General, US Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, CHANNING PHILLIPS, Tracy Renaud and United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
Case Number: 3:2021cv03145
Filed: June 30, 2021
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sue E Myerscough
Referring Judge: Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2021 TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Parties' Motion for Extension of Time to Establish Rule 16 Discovery Plan #21 is ALLOWED. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set 9/8/2021 is CANCELLED and reset Wednesday, 10/13/2021 at 11:00 a.m. (Court will place call) before Magistrate Judge Schanzle-Haskins. Proposed plan to be filed by 10/8/2021. Defendants' Motion to File Redacted Certified Record #22 is ALLOWED. Defendants are directed to file the redacted Certified Administrative Record. (LB)
August 19, 2021 Filing 22 MOTION to File Administrative Record by Defendants Alejandro Mayorkas, Office of the Attorney General, CHANNING PHILLIPS, Tracy Renaud, US Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. Responses due by 9/2/2021 (Attachments: #1 Administrative Record-Part 1, #2 Administrative Record-Part 2)(Frooman, Hilary)
August 19, 2021 Filing 21 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Rule 16 Discovery Plan by Defendants Alejandro Mayorkas, Office of the Attorney General, CHANNING PHILLIPS, Tracy Renaud, US Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. Responses due by 9/2/2021 (Frooman, Hilary)
August 5, 2021 NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set Wednesday, 9/8/2021, at 9:30 AM (court will place call) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Attorneys are directed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) by meeting as soon as practicable, and in any event at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference, and are to submit a proposed discovery plan in writing to the Court on or before 9/3/2021. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(E) with proposed deadlines. The parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of electronically stored information, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, concerning discovery of electronically stored information. If a discovery plan is not submitted as required, the scheduling hearing will not be held and costs may be assessed. Lead counsel or other counsel of record with knowledge of the case should be available to participate in the Rule 16 scheduling hearing. (LB)
August 4, 2021 Filing 20 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Alejandro Mayorkas, Office of the Attorney General, CHANNING PHILLIPS, Tracy Renaud, US Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services.(Frooman, Hilary)
July 28, 2021 TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #19 is ALLOWED. Extension granted to 8/9/2021 for Defendants to answer or otherwise plead. (LB)
July 27, 2021 Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendants Alejandro Mayorkas, Office of the Attorney General, CHANNING PHILLIPS, Tracy Renaud, US Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. Responses due by 8/10/2021 (Frooman, Hilary)
July 19, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Noelia Rodriguez-Quinones on behalf of LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC. (Rodriguez-Quinones, Noelia)
July 14, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Hilary W Frooman on behalf of All Defendants (Frooman, Hilary)
July 1, 2021 Remark: Attorneys Michelle Nicole Bradford and Heather D. Graham-Oliver are not admitted to practice in this District. Emails sent to attorneys with instructions on how to apply for admission. (MJC)
June 30, 2021 Filing 16 Case transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:21-cv-00487. .
June 30, 2021 Filing 15 Case transferred to the USDC for the Central District of Illinois pursuant to #14 Order on Motion to Transfer Case,,, Sent to Court via extraction. (ztd)
June 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois: Upon consideration of Defendants' consent motion to transfer and for extension of time to file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, Dkt. #13 , it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 6/20/2021. (lcrdm3)
June 17, 2021 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION to Transfer Case by ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Graham-Oliver, Heather). Added MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer on 6/22/2021 (znmw).
June 17, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather D. Graham-Oliver on behalf of All Defendants (Graham-Oliver, Heather)
May 13, 2021 Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE served on 5/12/2021 (Bradford, Michelle)
April 30, 2021 Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CHANNING PHILLIPS served on 4/29/2021 (Bradford, Michelle)
April 28, 2021 Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served 3/5/2021 (Bradford, Michelle) Modified on 4/28/2021 (ztd).
April 28, 2021 Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. Alejandro Mayorkas served 3/5/2021 (Bradford, Michelle) Modified on 4/28/2021 (ztd).
April 28, 2021 Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. TRACY RENAUD served 3/5/2021 (Bradford, Michelle) Modified text on 4/28/2021 (ztd).
April 28, 2021 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed.U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES served on 3/5/2021 (Bradford, Michelle) Modified text on 4/28/2021 (ztd).
April 28, 2021 NOTICE OF ERROR re #9 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant; emailed to [email protected], cc'd 5 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Reminder to select the parties served and enter dates served. The Court has made modifications the these entries. (ztd, )
March 2, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 03/01/2021. (lcrdm3)
March 1, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zsb)
February 25, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC. re Notice of QC- New Case,, filed by LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC.. Related document: Notice of QC- New Case,,.(Bradford, Michelle)
February 25, 2021 Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC. (Bradford, Michelle)
February 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC. against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et. al ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8243552) filed by LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons Summons DHS, #8 Summons Summons Mayorkas, #9 Summons Summons USCIS, #10 Summons Summons Renaud)(Bradford, Michelle)
February 25, 2021 NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to [email protected], cc'd 4 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Blank or missing coversheet. Please use the cover sheet at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet., 2. Form filed as fillable PDF. Please file form in a non-fillable PDF format., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zsb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of the Attorney General
Represented By: Hilary W Frooman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Heather D. Graham-Oliver
Represented By: Hilary W Frooman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Heather D. Graham-Oliver
Represented By: Hilary W Frooman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHANNING PHILLIPS
Represented By: Hilary W Frooman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tracy Renaud
Represented By: Heather D. Graham-Oliver
Represented By: Hilary W Frooman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
Represented By: Heather D. Graham-Oliver
Represented By: Hilary W Frooman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEVI, RAY & SHOUP INC.
Represented By: Michelle Nicole Bradford
Represented By: Noelia Rodriguez-Quinones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?