Ferguson v. Shiseido Americas Corporation
Plaintiff: Brittany Ferguson
Defendant: Shiseido Americas Corporation
Case Number: 3:2021cv03181
Filed: August 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sue E Myerscough
Referring Judge: Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #6 Memorandum by Plaintiff Brittany Ferguson. Responses due by 10/25/2021 (Wise, Brandon)
September 24, 2021 TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #8 is ALLOWED. Extension granted to 10/25/2021 for Plaintiff to file her response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #5 . (LB)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER CONCERNING CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN CASES INVOLVING INITIAL DISPOSITIVE MOTION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 9/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice, #2 Form) (LB)
September 10, 2021 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Shiseido Americas Corporation. (Rosenthal, Jeffrey)
September 10, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Shiseido Americas Corporation. Responses due by 9/24/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenthal, Jeffrey)
September 10, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David J. Oberly, I on behalf of Shiseido Americas Corporation (Oberly, David)
August 6, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Andrew Schrag on behalf of Shiseido Americas Corporation (Schrag, Andrew)
August 5, 2021 TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Notice of Removal filed 8/3/2021 reviewed. Plaintiff is given to 9/3/2021 to file objections and a motion to remand. Failure to do so is deemed to mean Plaintiff has no legal opposition to removal and this case may proceed in this court. Further, Defendant Shiseido Americas Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead #2 is ALLOWED. Extension granted to 9/20/2021 for Defendant to answer or otherwise plead. (LB)
August 4, 2021 Filing 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead to Complaint by Defendant Shiseido Americas Corporation. Responses due by 8/18/2021 (Rosenthal, Jeffrey)
August 3, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Sangamon County Illinois, case number 2021L000114 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3726129), filed by Shiseido Americas Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rosenthal, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferguson v. Shiseido Americas Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Ferguson
Represented By: Brandon Michael Wise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shiseido Americas Corporation
Represented By: Jeffrey N Rosenthal
Represented By: Andrew Schrag
Represented By: David J. Oberly, I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?