Ryder v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| Elizabeth Ryder |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 3:2021cv03228 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Compliance. (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 15 DISCOVERY PLAN - PROPOSED/Report of Rule 26(f)Planning Meeting by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 13 Reply by Elizabeth Ryder re #11 Answer to Amended Complaint .. (Slocomb, Paul) |
| NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set Thursday, 1/6/2022, at 11:00 AM (court will place call) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Attorneys are directed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) by meeting as soon as practicable, and in any event at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference, and are to submit a proposed discovery plan in writing to the Court on or before 1/4/2022. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(E) with proposed deadlines. The parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of electronically stored information, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, concerning discovery of electronically stored information. If a discovery plan is not submitted as required, the scheduling hearing will not be held and costs may be assessed. Lead counsel or other counsel of record with knowledge of the case should be available to participate in the Rule 16 scheduling hearing. (LB) |
| Filing 12 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Railway Company, filed by Elizabeth Ryder. (KB) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Norfolk Southern Railway Company answer due 12/15/2021. (KB) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 12/1/2021. Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint #9 is ALLOWED. The Clerk is directed to file the proposed First Amended Complaint Attached to the Motion. Defendant directed to file a responsive pleading by 12/15/2021. (KB)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File to file First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Elizabeth Ryder. Responses due by 12/13/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed First Amended Complaint)(Slocomb, Paul) |
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Kurt E Reitz on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Reitz, Kurt) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elizabeth Ryder. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Slocomb, Paul) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company and returned by mail to Plaintiff's counsel to effectuate service. (SKN) |
| Notice of Docket Text or Event Modification re #1 Complaint. Docket text corrected to show Complaint filed against Norfolk Southern Railway Company and not Elizabeth Ryder. NEF regenerated to all parties. (SKN) |
| Filing 3 Request for Summons. (Slocomb, Paul) Modified on 12/20/2021 (ME). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Civil Cover Sheet (Slocomb, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elizabeth Ryder ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3789652.), filed by Elizabeth Ryder.(Slocomb, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ryder v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ryder | |
| Represented By: | Paul T Slocomb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Kurt E Reitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
