Schmidt et al v. Hyde
| Dana M. Schmidt, Blake M. Sisk and Michael L. Sisk |
| John J. Hyde |
| 3:2021cv03261 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DISCOVERY PLAN - PROPOSED/Report of Rule 26(f)Planning Meeting by John J. Hyde. (Paulin, Helen) |
| NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set Wednesday, 2/9/2022, at 10:00 AM (court will place call) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Attorneys are directed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) by meeting as soon as practicable, and in any event at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference, and are to submit a proposed discovery plan in writing to the Court on or before 2/7/2022. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(E) with proposed deadlines. The parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of electronically stored information, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, concerning discovery of electronically stored information. If a discovery plan is not submitted as required, the scheduling hearing will not be held and costs may be assessed. Lead counsel or other counsel of record with knowledge of the case should be available to participate in the Rule 16 scheduling hearing. (LB) |
| TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Notice of Removal filed 12/9/2021. reviewed. Plaintiffs are given to 1/9/2022 to file objections and a motion to remand. Failure to do so is deemed to mean Plaintiffs have no legal opposition to removal and this case may proceed in this court. Entered on 12/21/2021. (ME) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by John J. Hyde.(Perryman, Ted) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to State and Plaintiffs of Filing by Defendant of Notice of Removal (Perryman, Ted) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Removal by John J. Hyde.. (Perryman, Ted) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by John J. Hyde. (Perryman, Ted) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Helen Patricia Paulin on behalf of John J. Hyde (Paulin, Helen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Korissa Marie Zickrick on behalf of John J. Hyde (Zickrick, Korissa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Ted L Perryman on behalf of John J. Hyde (Perryman, Ted) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Adams County, case number 2021L44 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3821733), filed by John J. Hyde. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Perryman, Ted) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
