Cox v. Butler-Jones
| Christopher J Cox |
| Marlo Butler-Jones |
| Habeas Attorney General |
| 3:2021cv03264 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Remark: USCA Order denying successive 2254 petition request. (TC) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT entered. (JMB) |
Filing 4
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 12/17/2021. The Court dismisses Petitioner Christopher Cox's Petition for Writ of Habeas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254 for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare the judgment. This case is CLOSED. See written order. (JMB)
|
| Filing 3 Letter from Christopher J Cox regarding payment of filing fee. (MAS) |
| Prisoner Filing Fee received 12/16/2021, in the amount of $ 5.00; receipt number 34626012843. (SKN) |
| Filing 2 Letter from Christopher J Cox regarding filing Habeas 2254 and advising the court that he is mailing the filing fee of $5.00 in a separate envelope. (MAS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Habeas 2254), filed by Christopher J Cox. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Appendix, #3 Proof of Service, #4 Envelope)(MAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
