Jones v. Sangamon County Jail et al
| Dallas Jones |
| Sangamon County Jail, Jack Campbell, Cheryl Williams, . Curry and City/County Springfield |
| 3:2022cv03060 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 6/17/2022. Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, filed his complaint, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a motion for appointment of counsel on April 19, 2022 #1 , #3 , #4 . Plaintiff was immediately advised he must notify the Court in writing of any change in his address or telephone number, and failure to do so would result in the dismissal of his lawsuit #2 . On May 4, 2022, a docket entry was returned to the clerk noting Plaintiff was no longer incarcerated at the address he had provided: the Sangamon County Jail. On May 11, 2022, the Court noted it had checked the IDOC website, but Plaintiff was not listed as an inmate, and regardless, it was ultimately Plaintiff's responsibility alone to provide his current address. See May 11, 2022, Text Order. In an abundance of caution, the Court allowed Plaintiff until May 18, 2022, to update his address or his case would be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has filed nothing further. In fact, Plaintiff has filed nothing since his complaint approximately two months ago #1 . Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute with due diligence and failure to follow a Court order. See Fed.R.Civ.P 41(b). All pending motions are denied as moot #3 , #4 .(SAG)
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re Text Order 5/11/2022. Mail sent to Dallas Jones. (SAG) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 5/11/2022. The pro se Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 19, 2022, and Plaintiff was immediately informed he must notify the Court in writing of any change in his mailing address and telephone number or his case could be dismissed #2 . On May 4, 2022, the Court was advised Plaintiff was no longer incarcerated at the address he provided. The Court has also checked the IDOC website, but Plaintiff is not currently listed as an inmate. Ultimately, it is Plaintiff's responsibility to provide the Court with his current address. The Court will allow Plaintiff until May 18, 2022, to provide his address in writing, or his case will be dismissed without prejudice.(SAG)
|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re #5 letter for trust fund ledger. (ED) |
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Dallas Jones (FDS) |
| Filing 5 Letter Requesting Trust Fund Ledger. Trust fund ledger sheets due by 5/5/2022. (SAG) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 5/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Dallas Jones. Responses due by 5/3/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Dallas Jones.(SAG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Dallas Jones.(SAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
